Man sentenced for pamphleteering

July 28, 2011 · 6:02 am

A Florida man will be spending some time in jail for activity that is usually allowed outside a courthouse.

Mark Schmidter passes out jury nullification brochures. (Courtesy Florida FIJA)

Mark Schmidter was found guilty of “indirect criminal contempt” Tuesday for passing out pamphlets in Orlando during the Casey Anthony trial, according to the Sentinel.

The pamphlets he was handing out described jury nullification, the power of a jury to return “a verdict of ‘Not Guilty’ despite its belief that the defendant is guilty of the violation charged.”

According to the Sentienel, Chief Judge Belvin Perry signed an order early this year banning the distribution of nullification pamphlets that were “meant to influence jurors.” In May, the same judge issued an order that set up “free speech zones” outside the couthouse in preparation for the outrage involved with the Casey Anthony trial.

The judge accused Schmidter of violating his orders and doled out two sentences: 141 days for the first offense and 151 days for the second. In addition, he was belted with a $250 fine for each charge.

The Orlando paper reports that someone else had tested the pamphleteering order with no consequences so Schmidter decided to do the same. He also said he didn’t believe he violated the “speech zone” order . “I said this must not apply to me because I’m not talking about any [particular] case,” he said.

Schmidter and his lawyer, Adam Sudbury, accuse the judge’s order of being too broad and “patently unreasonable.

“It is prohibited for any person or group to engage in any type of First Amendment activities within the main Orange County courthouse complex grounds, unless the First Amendment activities occur within a designated Exempt Zone…”

Schmidter said it could be construed to mean “nobody could carry on a conversation outside the free speech zone.”

During his trial, Schmidter reportedly read the First Amendment out loud in the court. He later told the judge, “I apologize to the court. In my brain, I was just fighting for my country.”

His attorney has already filed for appeal, according to a Facebook page set up to support Schmidter.

Jury nullification isn’t as widely practiced or desired in our current legal system. However, it was encouraged as part of the sytem of checks and balances in the early history of the nation. Cheif Justice John Jay once said to a jury, “You have a right to take upon yourselves to judge [both the facts and law].”

As to the ban on pamphlets and “free speech zones”, both have been deemed unconstitutional by sensible judges. The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education has fought the same tyranny on college campuses for years, with judges usually shooting down the bans.

In February, Judge Andrew Napolitano blasted Judge Perry for his pamphlet ban: “It’s irrelevant what the pamphlet said. In America, we have the natural and constitutional right to free speech. Where on Earth does this judge presume to get the authority to stop anyone from saying anything outside a public courthouse? Has he ever heard of the First Amendment?”

Speaking of judicial authority, it seems that there is another flaw contained in our justice system that is relevant to this case. Since Schmidter was held in contempt, he faced the same judge that charged him. “I’m not getting a trial by jury, just thought I’d throw that in,” he said.

It would seem, that in a “fair” system, a defendant would face an impartial judge, instead of the same judge that has filed the charge. Seems to me like the judge has a bit of conflict of interest.

To learn more about jury nullification and jury rights, visit the Fully Informed Jury Association.


About HSkipRob
Author, Real Estate and Business Consultant., Inc.; Enles Solutions; Author: The Achilles Heel; The IRS Notice Federal Tax Lien, Inventor; Robinson Vertical Axis Wind and Water turbines. Blog Admin/Owner -, an Online News Forum. Blog Admin/Owner - Repairing the Scales of Justice; a voluntary association of jurists

2 Responses to Man sentenced for pamphleteering

  1. Pingback: “First…Kill All the Lawyers” « Jeff Oakes

  2. hskiprob says:

    If Congress cannot pass such a law, can the legislatively pass the ability to create such a law on to the Judiciary? The answer is obvioulsy, NO. Amendment 1 says, Congress shall make no law….of abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble. Apparently Judges now have more power than Congress and don’t have to obey the Constitution. The problem is as Jefferson warned the Consitution affords Citizens no recourse against the Judicary. Since Judges are seldom held responsible for their obvious ursupations of the Constitution. by their own members of the BAR, it is merely the Foxes ruling over the Chicken Coup. They have become Kings instead of public survants. Do as I demand or off with your head.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Real Currencies

Supporting People and the Commonwealth and resisting the Money Power by defeating Usury

Iraq Currency Watch

This blog is dedicated to the Iraqi Dinar


Res ipsa loquitur ("The thing itself speaks")


An online Journal by Bill Buppert devoted to the total abolition of slavery and the State.

Watts Up With That?

The world's most viewed site on global warming and climate change


...integrating Christian faith and knowledge in the public square

Adask's law

The Profit of Injustice

Radical Agenda

Common Sense Extremism

Real Science

"Science is the belief in the ignorance of the experts" - Richard Feynman

Laser Hacker Alternative Energy

Alternative projects, inventions, experiments and DIY projects

Christopher Cantwell

Radical Agenda

Bruce Krasting

My Take on Financial Events


At Your Service

Mind Control in America BLOG

Renee Pittman Books... an in depth look into historic and ongoing development programs, and use of highly advanced psycho-physical, psychological electronic mind invasive technology, using extremely low frequency radio waves and microwaves designed for covert, mass and social population control, manipulation and influence, on individuals, groups and large populations, legalized for nonconsensual military and law enforcement testing operations post 9/11. ***************************************************************************************************************** NOTE: These blogs were expertly edited and proofread before publishing. However, as interests grows on these specific topics, the agency monitoring the author and other whistleblower efforts, logically hope to keep this information hidden from the public. As a result, these blogs are being accessed repeatedly and are strategically being tampered with. This is being done by cleverly inserting typographical, punctuation and misspelled words. This is an obvious hope to plant a negative impression that the author is illiterate and also as a hope to turn people off to the information held within. Get the picture? Our admin team continues to catch and make corrections. **************************************************************************************************************** The science nonfiction DOCUMENTARY / DOCUDRAMA THRILLER depicting the FACTUAL use of patented microwave technology designed to create the beamed "Hearing Voices Effect" entitled "MIND CONTROL: SCHIZOPHRENIC HIGH TECH FRAUD" is available on Amazon.

Memory Hole

Reflections on Media and Politics | © Memory Hole Blog / James F. Tracy 2012-2016

Exposing Faux Capitalism

to the dismay of the Federal Reserve and other faux capitalists

%d bloggers like this: