The Corporations of the Fasci

The number of Corporations that contract with the various government jurisdictions, the local Cities, Counties, Parishes, States, the Federal Government, and the various independent agencies such as the South Florida Water Management District, is so large that a very large book would be needed to just list them all and the money they have received over the years.  About $4.3 trillion is currently available in government contracts in the United States and this collusion between government and commercial interests is so flagrant that another book with all the Articles about it, could be written yet the bureaucracy is so controlled, that prosecutors spend most of their time prosecuting the whistleblowers instead of those who are being exposed by them.       

My favorite Fascist organization that exposes how the taxpayer’s money is being diverted by the ruling class to private and publicly owned corporations is McKinsey & Company, Inc. More the half of their employees have been former government employees and the Company helps procure employees for top-ranking positions within both the government but also many of the private and publicly held corporations and institutions like the invitation-only think tanks such as the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). (see links below)

Oh yes, people like the Clintons, Bushes, Barrack Obama, Henry Kissinger and a long list of other high-ranking government officials and military contractors have all been members of the CFR and you are not invited.  

The likelihood that they help to formulate the propaganda (news) coming out to the Corporate owned media is extremely high. You will also find many of those involved with McKensey are also members of the World Economic Forum (WEF) whose membership includes most of the Heads of State of the G-7 and EU.  

I use the term Fasci to describe these people because someone once stated that Fascism is “the merger of State and Corporate powers”. It enriches those involved, at the majority’s expense.  Homelessness in the U.S. increased by 11% last year as $billions are being sent to the highly fascist country of Ukraine who has now abolished all political opposition parties and postponed any upcoming elections. These folks came into power by overthrowing their government in 2014 with the help of $billionaires like George Soros.

If I were to come up with a single common denominator involved with all the social and monetary policies currently in place, one could argue that it is McKensey & Company, Inc.                         

  1. McKinsey & Company – one of the world’s largest consulting firms with over $15+ billion (2021) in annual income with 38,000 employees.   

Mckinsey & Company, Inc. is located in over 130+ cities and in over 65 countries.   

“A November 1, 1993, profile story in Fortune magazine said that McKinsey & Company was “the most well-known, most secretive, most high-priced, most prestigious, most consistently successful, most envied, most trusted, most disliked management consulting firm on earth”.[26] In the article, McKinsey was cited as claiming that its consultants were not motivated by money,[26] and that partners talked to each other with “a sense of personal affection and admiration”.[26] The article described a culture clash that occurred in the early 1990s, leading to the departure of 151 out of the 254 ICG staff members.” – Wikipedia

OTTAWA – The deputy minister of Public Services and Procurement Canada says the federal government’s ethics rules do not disqualify consulting firm McKinsey & Company from doing business with the federal government despite scrutiny of the firm’s global track record. The government says McKinsey has received at least $116.8 million in federal contracts since 2015. At a news conference Monday, Conservative MP Garnett Genuis said the federal government shouldn’t be contracting with McKinsey. “We cannot work with a company that’s behaving in the way McKinsey has.”

The Trudeau government has awarded $66 million in contracts to management consulting firm McKinsey & Company. – Government will review McKinsey contracts, Trudeau says | CBC News

“For the world’s best-known corporate-management consultants, helping tackle the pandemic has been a bonanza. It’s not clear what the government has gotten in return.”   

“Advising both Chinese state companies and the Pentagon, McKinsey & Co. comes under scrutiny. McKinsey in recent years has faced accusations of alleged conflicts of interest in its bankruptcy work and other fields. – – Advising both Chinese state companies and the Pentagon, McKinsey & Co. comes under scrutiny (nbcnews.com)

“The company this year agreed to pay $573 million to settle allegations from 49 states that its work for opioid manufacturers helped “turbocharge” sales of the drugs, contributing to a deadly addiction epidemic. At the same time the firm was working for the pharmaceutical companies, McKinsey was advising the Food and Drug Administration on its prescription drug policy, according to court documents.

VA- $22.5 million

Air Force – $12 million

Defense Health Agency (DHA) – $61. Million

New York & New Jersey – $18 million

Altogether, in the four months since the pandemic started, the firm has been awarded work for state, city, and federal agencies worth well over $100 million — and counting.”

How McKinsey Is Making $100 Million (and Counting) Advising on the Government’s Bumbling Coronavirus Response — ProPublica

The fact the U.S. was the very “worst” from a per capita standpoint of nations in both cases and deaths as accounted for by John Hopkins University is eluminating. Was it their ideas to implement masking,      

Bob Sternfels – Global Managing Partner

“Scott Blackburn headed the Coronavirus response and garnered these no bid contracts.  

Gary Pinkus, chairman of the firm’s North America operations

List of former employees of McKinsey & Company – Wikipedia

Websites that promote and assists in obtaining government contracts:

Deltek: Top 20 Unrestricted Federal Opportunities for FY 2023 (deltek.com)

Pavilion: Pavilion: Free Cooperative Contract Search for Governments (withpavilion.com)

Bloomberg: Bloomberg Government – Home | BGOV  

MY Gov Watch: MyGovWatch – Free RFP Leads

Hudson: Bid writing expertise and guide: 5 Tips to Win State Government Contracts – Hudson Bid Writers (hudson-bidwriters.com)  

Resources and links:   

  1. McKinsey Center for Government | Public Sector | McKinsey & Company
  2. Dominic Barton says he wasn’t involved in federal McKinsey contracts | CTV News
  3. McKinsey & Company – Wikipedia
  4. The World Economic Forum (weforum.org)
  5. List of Public Figures (R129) (weforum.org)
  6. Members of the Council on Foreign Relations – Wikipedia
  7. Council on Foreign Relations (cfr.org)

Value and Price; cryptos and fiats

From at least 5,000 years, the price equilibrium and basis of value, has been gold and silver for the vast majority of people around the world. Right now, just about every person on the planet that has some spare cash, can easily find out exactly how much of their particular currency they would have to use to buy one ounce of gold or silver, unless perhaps they live in a remote village in the Amazonian basin, and they don’t have or need money.  

Price equilibrium or lack of price stability is the primary reason why fiat and crypto currencies don’t make for good mediums of exchange, money. Their value and prices have not remained stable over long periods of time. The uncertainty of what the price or value will be next week, month, or year surely discourages some people from excepting them, especially those businesses that operate on small profit margins. A loss in value of the currency of say 5% could make some companies that only have an annual single digit profit margins unprofitable and thus unable to continue to operate. Grocery stores are one such group of companies that often operate on single digit annual profit margins. With cryptos going up or down over 10% in a single day, they would not be a rationale fit for even the largest grocery chains.

Bitcoin, the crypto token with the largest market cap, price volatility has been huge and many fiat currencies around the world have lost more than 5% in value just in the last year. Also, just in the last year, Bitcoin has gone from a high of just under $40,000 to a low of about $15,700 and now stands at $28,972 down 25.29% for the year. Since 1900, the USD has lost over 98% of its original purchasing power and value, and the Federal Reserve Bank and government have had to go to extremes to both stimulate the U.S. economy and slow the inflation rate.  If we are in a period of stagflation, as many economists suggest, their efforts over the long term will be futile, either ending up in long term recession/depression or hyper-inflation.  

Some politicians started promising they would cut the Federal budget 40+ years ago and other than the sale of military bases under the Clinton Administration, the total Federal budget did not go down one penny in all those years, leaving us today with $32 trillion in debt that we the taxpayers must pay interest on. No one has ever been able to drain the swamp, at least in my lifetime, so don’t hold your breath and it’s likely way past the point to no return, to do so now.  

I’m not trying to pick on Bitcoin or any other crypto token, but they will not make for good currencies unless they are, at least, partially backed by a commodity that has a stable value. One could argue that neither does gold or silver, as their prices have also gone significantly up and down over recent years.

However, it is not the purchasing power of gold and silver that has gone up or down, it’s the value of the currency that they are being compared to. What you can purchase with one ounce of silver or gold has remained about the same for at least the last 125 years.

There must be underlying reasons why so many central banks, governments, and investors have been buying gold and silver in the last decade at record amounts.  The issuers of fiat or crypto currencies would be wise to at least partially back them, as the USD and most other currencies once were, with physical gold and or silver.  The price equilibrium and value of the fiat and crypto currencies have been way too volatile for the markets to be totally comfortable with them and even the smallest amount of uncertainty continue to affect the prices of just about everything.   

There are various functions that many consider to be necessary for something to be a good medium of exchange and store of value. To fulfill these various functions, money must be:

  • Fungible: its individual units must be capable of mutual substitution (i.e., interchangeability).
  • Durable: able to withstand repeated use.
  • Divisible: divisible to small units.
  • Portable: easily carried and transported.
  • Acceptable: most people must accept the money as payment
  • Scarce: its supply in circulation must be limited.

As is self-evident, with both crypto and fiat currencies, it can be easily argued that they do not provide all these functions and fungibility, acceptance and scarcity are major considerations.     

Socialist/Fascists Jews, a/k/a (Zionists) in History: Tricks and Treachery

I made this list initially to organize all those historically that were or are considered to be “socialist” Jews in an attempt to either expose or exonerate the Zionist movement. There are many Jews opposed to Zionism, so get the thought of anti-Semitism out of you mind. This isn’t about the Jewish culture or religion, it’s about Zionism and their use of democratic socialism to steal the wealth from the majority. Feel free to send additional known Zionists to this list by sending it in an email or comment, as it is much much longer than most realize. Just remember, it is important to associate them with either the known world’s Zionist organizations or the various democratic socialist political parties and movements they control, that plague our world. You will also find them as the heads of banks, major investment groups and corporations, such as Pfizer’s CEO, Albert Bourla who is pushing to having everyone in the world vaxxed so he can make $billions for himself and his company of known liars and thieves, already have paid $billions in fines for the crimes. As an example, you’ll find a number of them in the Council On Foreign Relations, the Trilateral Commission, the Bilderberger Group, or such as Klaus Schwab who heads the World Economic Forum. They’re everywhere in the various government bureaucracies, even the United Nations, World Bank, IMF, Bank of International Settlement and the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development https://www.oecd.org Also remember, they now know a lot of people are on to the Tricks and Treachery, so it’s getting harder to prove those who are in the movement.

As an example, Henry Kissinger is or was in the Council on Foreign Relations (Zionist controlled) and he was caught saying in a cable released by Wikileaks “The illegal we do all the time, the unconstitutional takes a bit longer”. Kissinger was and is a notorious war monger and was always stirring up conflict between nations. See his bio below. As you will see they strive to gain control of the various political organizations using democratic socialist polices to tax and redistribute the majorities wealth to their special interests such as many of the companies that make up the military industrial complex, so warfare is a major part of their agenda and they use all sorts of tricks and lies as the Pentagon Papers revealed to get countries into wars, so they can sell goods and services to the governments. That’s their Modus Operandi (MO) and just about everything out of the mouths is a lie to achieve this goal.

Here is the Wikipedia page on Zionism; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zionism Just remember with Wikipedia, the Zionist try to control content as they do in the corporate controlled media. I have found that although Wikipedia provides a lot of well know facts, you can surely observe their political leaning toward democratic socialism and abhorrence to libertarianism. There greatest fear is to lose control of the power to tax and redistribute the majority wealth to their special interests.   

This is strictly my definition of Zionism and if disagreement is met from it, then I do not mind amending it to clarify this issue. Zionists are those that believe they are God’s chosen people and as such are the rightful and legitimate political and economic rulers/leaders of the 230 +/- nation-states and other government organizations such as the World Bank, IMF, United Nations, etc. that make up earth. It is very important to note, that not all Jews believe in the Zionist movement but as I will show later, the Zionist movement is real and their members on occasion have arrogantly disclosed the movements intentions.

Zionists use both political and economic power to prey on taxpayers, especially the civilian population. They are also promoting social policies like excessive taxation and regulatory fees, prohibitions on such things as recreational and medicinal herbs such as hemp, cocaine, opiates and other recreational drugs, alcohol, exclusionary policies such as licensing laws and college accreditation, and of course control over the educational curriculum.     

They appear to like the Roman republic model of governance with elected representation, knowing an ambitious politician is easily bought off and they can then use the tax money to manipulate the system to their advantage.    

In the Magna Carta (1615) it was the following four (4) Clauses that first gave me the idea of taking note of their importance in the study of socio-economics. I knew they were monetarily influential, but I had no idea, how they had infiltrated the various government institutions, including the government controlled educations systems to enhance their agendas. We’ve caught those paying for their kids to be accepted into some of these colleges just recently, so god only knows just how many of them have monetarily manipulated they education system to get their degrees and other accreditations while denying others who oppose them, their degrees. As you will see, it’s just not coincidental that so many of them ended up pushing the democratic socialist agenda and sadly so many people have fallen for their trickery and treachery. These are the four (4) clauses that started me down the proverbial rabbit hole.

10. If one who has borrowed from the Jews any sum, great or small, die before that loan be repaid, the debt shall not bear interest while the heir is under age, of whomsoever he may hold; and if the debt fall into our hands, we will not take anything except the principal sum contained in the bond.

11. And if anyone die indebted to the Jews, his wife shall have her dower and pay nothing of that debt; and if any children of the deceased are left under age, necessaries shall be provided for them in keeping with the holding of the deceased; and out of the residue the debt shall be paid, reserving, however, service due to feudal lords; in like manner let it be done touching debts due to others than Jews.

12. No scutage nor aid shall be imposed on our kingdom, unless by common counsel of our kingdom, except for ransoming our person, for making our eldest son a knight, and for once marrying our eldest daughter; and for these there shall not be levied more than a reasonable aid. In like manner it shall be done concerning aids from the City of London.

13. And the city of London shall have all it ancient liberties and free customs, as well by land as by water; furthermore, we decree and grant that all other cities, boroughs, towns, and ports shall have all their liberties and free customs.

Then, when I learned about the City of London, not being the same as London, the capitol of England, I was amazed to find out that this City is the oldest City in all of the United Kingdom, much older teh London, still in existence and many of the wealthier financial interest in the world just happen to have their businesses and banks there. Must be just a coincidence?   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LrObZ_HZZUc

“The City of London, some suggest is the financial capital of the world and if it is, it may have been so, for many millenniums. The number of promenade banks and corporation headquarters or operating branches out of there is huge. As an example “N M Rothschild & Sons financial strength in the City of London became such that by 1825–26, the bank was able to supply enough coin to the Bank of England to enable it to avert a liquidity crisis. – Wikipedia.  The wealth may go back as far as the 8th to the 10th century as the Roman Republic declined and evacuated.  Other Jewish financiers like the BischoffsheimsGoldschmidts, Pereires, Seligmans, Lazards, and others, and these financiers by their integrity and financial skill obtained credit not alone with their Jewish confrères, but with the banking fraternity in general. By this means, Jewish financiers obtained an increasing share of international finance during the middle and last quarter of the 19th century. The head of the whole group was the Rothschild family…”

The Jews could be put down very plausibly as the most unpleasant race ever heard of. As commonly encountered they lack any of the qualities that mark the civilized man: courage, dignity, incorruptibility, ease, confidence. They have vanity without pride, voluptuousness without taste, and learning without wisdom. Their fortitude, such as it is, is wasted upon puerile objects, and their charity is mainly a form of display.” — M.L. Mencken

THE LONG LIST OF FASCI:

Ludwig Bamberger, (22 July 1823 – 14 March 1899) was a German economist, politician, revolutionary and writer. Bamberger was born into the wealthy Ashkenazi Jewish Bamberger family in Mainz. After studying at GiessenHeidelberg, and Göttingen, he became a lawyer. In the German Reichstag he was the leading authority on matters of finance and economics, as well as a clear and persuasive speaker, and it was chiefly owing to him that a gold currency was adopted and that the Reichsbank took form; in his later years he wrote and spoke strongly against bimetallism. He was the leader of the free traders, and after 1878 refused to follow Bismarck in his new policy of protection, state socialism and colonial development. On account of his opposition to Bismarck’s economic policy, he left the National Liberal Party and joined the “Secessionists” which later merged into the German Free-minded Party. He was also a founder of the Verein zur Förderung der Handelsfreiheit (Group for the Promotion of Free Trade). He founded the Bundesbank of Germany which was in the business of lending for trade and mercantilism.  

Daniel De Leon (/də ˈliːɒn/; December 14, 1852 – May 11, 1914) was an American socialist newspaper editorpoliticianMarxist theoretician, and trade union organizer. Daniel De Leon was born December 14, 1852 in Curaçao, the son of Salomon de Leon and Sarah Jesurun De Leon. His father was a surgeon in the Royal Netherlands Army and a colonial official. His family ancestry is believed to be Dutch Jewish of the Spanish and Portuguese community; “De León” is a Spanish surname, oftentimes toponymic, in which case it can possibly indicate a family’s geographic origin in the Medieval Kingdom of León. His father lived in the Netherlands before coming to Curaçao when receiving his commission in the military. Salomon De Leon died on January 18, 1865, when Daniel was twelve and was the first to be buried in the new Jewish cemetery.[2]

Paul Lafargue (in French lafaʁg/; 15 January 1842  – 25 November 1911) was a French revolutionary Marxist socialist journalist, literary critic, political writer and activist; he was Karl Marx‘s son-in-law having married his second daughter, Laura. His best known work is The Right To Be Lazy. Born in Cuba to French and Creole parents, Lafargue spent most of his life in France, with periods in England and Spain. At the age of 69, he and 66-year-old Laura died together by a suicide pact. Lafargue was born in Santiago de Cuba. His father was the owner of coffee plantations in Cuba, and the family’s wealth allowed Lafargue to study in Santiago and then in France. His four grandparents were a French Christian, an Indian from Jamaica, a Mulatto refugee from Haiti, and a French Jew. Lafargue has remarked that he was an “international[ist] of blood before [he] was one of ideology” and that “the blood of three oppressed races runs in my veins.

Fabio Grobart (also Antonio Blanco) was born in BiałystokPoland August 30, 1905; his birth name was Abraham Grobart a.k.a. Abraham Simjovitch. Apparently following orders of the Comintern, during the early 1920s he became a founding member of the Cuban Communist Party. After in 1922 entering the Young Communist League of Poland, and additional Communist activities he may have been sentenced to death and this may have obliged him to leave Poland to settle in Cuba.

He played an important, though generally undocumented, role in guiding the political leadership of Cuba’s 1959 Revolution along a socialist path. Fabio Grobart was one of the founders of the Communist Party in Cuba in 1925, “and for decades served as a party ideologue and the man who introduced Castro at party meetings” (Goering, 2001). Grobart was both a member of the Cuban Communist Party Central Committee and a member of Parliament. According to Boris Kozolchyk[1] Fabio Grobart was ethnically “Jewish,” and may not have been a practicing Jew. He apparently never objected to the Cuban government’s “attitude toward religion, Zionism and Israel… “.[12]

Harry Dexter White, former name was Weit (October 9, 1892 – August 16, 1948) was a senior U.S. Treasury department official. Working closely with the Secretary of the Treasury Henry Morgenthau, Jr., he helped set American financial policy toward the Allies of World War II while at the same time he passed numerous secrets to the Soviet Union, which was an American ally for part of the time and an adversary at other times.[1]

Harry Dexter White was born in Boston, Massachusetts, the seventh and youngest child of Jewish Lithuanian immigrants, Joseph Weit and Sarah Magilewski, who had settled in America in 1885. White admired the Soviet Union. Historian Sam Tanenhaus says he spied for them: White was accused in 1948 of spying for the Soviet Union, which he adamantly denied. Although he was never a Communist party member, his status as a Soviet informant was later confirmed by declassified FBI documents related to the interception and decoding of Soviet communications, known as the Venona Project.[2]  

So, we might want to ask ourselves if the FBI knew it, why wasn’t he prosecuted? He was literally a Jewish Spy for the Soviet Union and communist sympathizer.  He was also the senior American official at the 1944 Bretton Woods conference that established the postwar economic order. He dominated the conference and imposed his vision of post-war financial institutions over the objections of John Maynard Keynes, the British representative. At Bretton Woods, White was a major architect of the International Monetary Fund and World Bank. J. Edgar Hoover was the Director of the FBI at that time.

Henry Morgenthau Jr. (/ˈmɔːrɡənθɔː/; May 11, 1891 – February 6, 1967) was the United States Secretary of the Treasury during most of the administration of Franklin D. Roosevelt. He played a major role in designing and financing the New Deal. After 1937, while still in charge of the Treasury, he played the central role in financing United States participation in World War II.  Morgenthau was born into a prominent Jewish family in New York City, the son of Josephine (Sykes) and Henry Morgenthau Sr., a real estate mogul and diplomat. 

Morgenthau was a strict monetarist. President Roosevelt, Morgenthau, and Federal Reserve Chairman Marriner Stoddard Eccles jointly kept interest rates low during the depression to finance massive public spending, and then later to support rearmament, support for Britain, and U.S. participation in WW II.[9][10][11]

Eugene Isaac Meyer (October 31, 1875 – July 17, 1959) was an American financier, public official, and newspaper publisher. He published the Washington Post from 1933 to 1946, and the paper stayed in his family throughout the rest of the 20th century. He served as Chairman of the Federal Reserve from 1930 to 1933 and was the first President of the World Bank Group. Born in Los Angeles, California, he was one of eight children of Harriet (née Newmark) and Marc Eugene Meyer. His parents were Alsatian Jews,[1] but he avoided identification as a Jew until later in life. His daughter was Katherine Graham who took over WaPo in 1946 along with her husband Phillip, also owners of various network TV and radio stations, mostly in So. Florida. Their nephew was Bob Graham, former Governor and U.S. Senator for Florida. Just so you know, a central bank is the 5th plank of communism and a key socialistic policy giving extreme financial powers to the Fasci. The Federal Reserve Bank and World Bank are key institutions to the controls by the international central banking cartel, they control.

Solomon Lazard, also known as S. Lazard, (1827–1916) was an entrepreneur in 19th century Los Angeles, California, a member of the city council there in 1854 and in 1861–62 and, some say,[1][2][3][4] the founder of the international banking firm Lazard Frères and Company. He and Eugene Isaac Meyer are cousins. Lazard arrived in the United States in 1844[8] or 1850[11] and became a U.S. citizen about 1853,[12] but In 1861 he visited France and was arrested on the charge that he still owed military duty to that country, where he had been born. He served six days in prison and then hired a substitute to take his place.[8]

Marcus Goldman (December 9, 1821 – July 20, 1904) was a German investment banker, businessman, and financier. He was born in TrappstadtBavaria and emigrated to the United States in 1848.[1] He was the founder of Goldman Sachs, which has since become one of the world’s largest investment banks.[2]

Marcus Goldman was born Mark Goldmann on December 9, 1821 in Trappstadt, Bavaria, Germany.[3][4] His father, Wolf Goldmann, was a farmer and cattle dealer.[3] His mother, Bella Katz Oberbrunner, who came from Zeil am Main, was widowed with five children from a former marriage; her first husband was called Samuel Oberbrunner.[3] His family was Ashkenazi Jewish. His paternal grandfather was called Jonathan Marx until he changed his name to Goldmann when Jews were allowed to have surnames in 1811. From his earliest days of his business, Goldman was able to singlehandedly transact as much as $5 million worth of commercial paper a year. Successful though he was, Goldman’s business was insignificant compared to that of the other Jewish-German bankers of the day. Concerns like J. & W. Seligman & Co., with working capital of $6 million in 1869 (equivalent of $113 million in 2018), were already modern-day investment bankers immersed in underwriting and trading railroad bonds. He started Goldman Sachs with his partner Joseph Sachs.

FYI: Ashkenazi Jews are a Jewish diaspora population who coalesced in the Holy Roman Empire around the end of the first millennium.[20]

Jacques Attali (French: [ʒak atali]; born 1 November 1943) is a French economic and social theorist, writer, political adviser and senior civil servant, who served as a counselor to President François Mitterrand from 1981 to 1991 and was the first head of the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development in 1991-1993. In 1997, upon the request of education minister Claude Allègre, he proposed a reform of the higher education degrees system. In 2008-2010, he led the government committee on how to ignite the growth of the French economy, under President Nicolas Sarkozy. Attali was born in Algiers (Algeria), with his twin brother Bernard Attali, in a Jewish family

It is Attali that is said to have put Emmanuel Macron into the French Presidency despite his lack of political experience having never been elected to any office before. Macron was also an employee of David Rothschilds at his Bank in France. His wife who was his high school teacher taught at The Lycée Saint-Louis-de-Gonzague (“Franklin”), founded in 1894, is a highly selective Roman Catholic, Jesuit school in the 16th arrondissement of Paris. It is regarded the most prestigious French private school and has been ranked #1 lycée in France in the ranking of the newspaper Le Figaro.

Along with the Lazare investment bankers, with ties the Former President Ho

Léon Blum (April 9, 1872 , ParisMarch 30, 1950 , Jouy-en-Josas at Versailles ) was a French politician and journalist , as leader of the Popular Front he became France’s Prime Minister from 1936 to 1938 . He called himself a Marxist , rejecting Leninism. Blum thus became historically the first socialist and Jew to hold the post of Prime Minister of France.  After the assassination of Jean Jaures, he became general secretary of the French Section of the Workers International in 1916, and in 1921, after the division of the party into democratic-socialist and communist, he became chairman of the socialists.  After the occupation of France by Germany, he became a prisoner in the Buchenwald and Dachau concentration camps. After the war he announced his departure from French politics and concentrated on international issues. He publicly supported the establishment of the State of Israel and the UN. He died on 30 March 1950. 

Golda Meir[nb 1] (born Golda Mabovitch; May 3, 1898 – December 8, 1978) was an Israeli teacher, kibbutznikstateswomanpolitician and the fourth Prime Minister of Israel.

In 1913, Golda returned to North Division High, graduating in 1915. While there, she became an active member of Young Poale Zion, which later became Habonim, the Labor Zionist youth movement. She spoke at public meetings and embraced Socialist Zionism.[13]

Daniel Gilbert (born January 17, 1962) is an American billionaire businessman, investor, and philanthropist. He is the cofounder of Quicken Loans and founder of Rock Ventures.[3] He is the owner of the National Basketball Association‘s Cleveland Cavaliers. Gilbert was born to a Jewish[7][8][9] family in DetroitMichigan.[10] He grew up in Southfield, Michigan, where he attended Southfield-Lathrup High School.[11] He earned his bachelor’s degree from Michigan State University and the State Bar of Michigan.[5] While in college he earned a real estate agent‘s license[12] and while in law school, he worked part-time at his parents’ Century 21 Real Estate agency.

Quicken, which originated nearly $146 billion in mortgages in 2019, went public as Rocket Companies in August 2020 at a $36 billion valuation.

Leonid Nevzlin Israeli billionaire businessman, ranked 52nd in the ranking of 100 richest Israelis with a fortune of NIS 3.6 billion, owns the Haaretz newspaper and the monthly Liberal. Nevzlin made his fortune when he served as senior director of the Russian oil giant Yukos, headed by his friend Mikhail Khodorkovsky. He enjoyed handsome dividends, before retiring to public activity. He was elected president of the Zionist Congress, senator in the House of Representatives and served in a senior position at the Tass News Agency.

The Russian government seized Yukos assets and dismantled it. Khodrokovsky was charged with corruption and sentenced to a lengthy prison term, from which he was released about seven years ago. Nevzlin was charged with a felony of murder, fled Russia to Israel and in 2008 was sentenced to life in prison.

Nevzlin claims that these are false accusations and a show trial conducted for political reasons. The Supreme Court of Israel and the International Court of Justice in The Hague have ruled that Nevzlin is a political persecutor and can therefore enter any country in the world. Courts in Israel and Europe have rejected extradition requests filed by Russia following the conviction.

Russia, on the other hand, is ignoring court decisions in The Hague, which have accepted Yukos’ claim that Russia has illegally taken over the company’s assets and must pay the corporation’s shareholders and executives huge compensation worth $ 50 billion.

Mikhail Borisovich Khodorkovsky (Russian: Михаил Борисович Ходорковский, IPA: [mʲɪxɐˈiɫ xədɐrˈkofskʲɪj]; born 26 June 1963) is an exiled Russian businessman, philanthropist and former oligarch,[2] now residing in London.[3] In 2003, Khodorkovsky was believed to be the wealthiest man in Russia, with a fortune estimated to be worth $15 billion, and was ranked 16th on Forbes list of billionaires.[

On 23 December 2015, a Russian court issued an international arrest warrant for Khodorkovsky whom the Investigative Committee of Russia charged with ordering the murder of Vladimir Petukhov, the mayor of Nefteyugansk, who was murdered in June 1998.[110][111] Speaking on the same day on BBC, which claimed Khodorkovsky “spent much of his time in London”,[112] he said he was “definitely considering” applying for political asylum in the UK and felt safe in London.[113]

In December 2016, a court unfroze $100m of Khodorkovsky’s assets that had been held in Ireland.[15]

Khodorkovsky’s parents, Boris and Marina Khodorkovsky, were engineers at a factory making measuring instruments in Moscow.[citation needed] Khodorkovsky’s father was Jewish, and his mother was Russian Orthodox Christian.

In March 2014, Khodorkovsky was presented with the “Man of the Year” award by the Polish newspaper Gazeta Wyborcza.[116] Khodorkovsky also delivered keynote speeches at the Le Monde Festival, the Freedom House Awards Dinner, the Council on Foreign Relations, the Oslo Freedom ForumForum 2000, the Vilnius ForumChatham House, the World Economic ForumStanford University, and the Atlantic Council.  These are all major organizations tied into the Zionist movement

Hans Joachim Morgenthau (February 17, 1904 – July 19, 1980) was one of the major twentieth-century figures in the study of international relations. Morgenthau’s works belong to the tradition of realism in international relations theory, and he is usually considered, along with George F. Kennan and Reinhold Niebuhr, one of the three leading American realists of the post-World War II period. Morgenthau made landmark contributions to international relations theory and the study of international law. His Politics Among Nations, first published in 1948, went through five editions during his lifetime.

Morgenthau was born in an Ashkenazi Jewish family in CoburgSaxe-Coburg and GothaGermany in 1904, and, after attending the Casimirianum, was educated at the universities of BerlinFrankfurt, and Munich, and pursued postdoctoral work at the Graduate Institute of International Studies in GenevaSwitzerland.

He taught and practiced law in Frankfurt before emigrating to the United States in 1937, after several interim years in Switzerland and Spain. One of his first jobs in the U.S. was teaching night school at Brooklyn College. From 1939 to 1943, Morgenthau taught in Kansas City and taught at Keneseth Israel Shalom Congregation there.[8] Morgenthau then was a professor at the University of Chicago until 1973, when he took a professorial chair at the City University of New York (CUNY).

Milton Joseph Rosenau (January 1, 1869 – April 9, 1946) was an American public health official and professor who was influential in the early twentieth century. Milton Joseph Rosenau was born in 1869 in PhiladelphiaPennsylvania,[2] to Nathan Rosenau and Mathilde Blitz, German Jewish emigrants. He started working for the government in 1989 until 1909 and then took a position at Harvard University where he established the Harvard and Massachusetts School of Health Officers. He was instrumental in guiding early vaccine and pasteurization policies.                   

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milton_J._Rosenau

Myer Feldman, known as Mike Feldman (June 22, 1914 – March 1, 2007), was an American political aide in the Kennedy and Johnson administrations. Hailing from Philadelphia, Feldman was a trained lawyer and alumnus of the University of Pennsylvania, which he attended on a scholarship. He served in the Army Air Force during the Second World War prior to joining Kennedy’s campaign trail in 1957.[1][2]

Under Kennedy he was tasked with compiling negative information on Richard Nixon during Kennedy’s election campaign, as well as helping with speech writing and television interviews.[1][2] His files on Nixon became known collectively as the “Nixopedia”.[3] He also worked on agriculture issues and foreign relations on the subject of nuclear arms sales, often meeting secretly with Israeli Prime Minister David Ben Gurion and Foreign Minister Golda Meir.[2] He was known for the rhyming couplets used when he and Theodore C. Sorensen, whom he succeeded as White House Counsel, traded memos.[1][2] In 1964 The New York Post called him “the White House’s anonymous man. “https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Myer_Feldman

Henry Alfred Kissinger KCMG (/ˈkɪsɪndʒər/;[2] German: [ˈkɪsɪŋɐ]; born Heinz Alfred Kissinger; May 27, 1923) is a German-born American politician, diplomat, and geopolitical consultant who served as United States Secretary of State and National Security Advisor under the presidential administrations of Richard Nixon and Gerald Ford.[3] A Jewish refugee who fled Nazi Germany with his family in 1938, he became National Security Advisor in 1969 and U.S. Secretary of State in 1973. For his actions negotiating a ceasefire in Vietnam, Kissinger received the 1973 Nobel Peace Prize under controversial circumstances, with two members of the committee resigning in protest.[4]Henry Kissinger was born Heinz Alfred Kissinger on May 27, 1923 in Fürth, Bavaria to homemaker Paula (née Stern; 1901–1998, from Leutershausen), and Louis Kissinger (1887–1982), a schoolteacher. He had a younger brother, business manager Walter (1924–2021). His family was German Jewish.[11] The surname Kissinger was adopted in 1817 by his great-great-grandfather Meyer Löb, after the Bavarian spa town of Bad Kissingen.[12] In his youth, Kissinger enjoyed playing soccer. He played for the youth team of SpVgg Fürth, which was one of the nation’s best clubs at the time.[13]

Klaus Schwab has been married since 1971 to Schaffhauser Hilde Schwab. The couple live in Switzerland and have two adult children, Nicole Schwab, co-founder of the Gender Equality Project in 2009, and Olivier Schwab, who is married to a Chinese woman and heads the WEF office in Beijing.[17]In September 2019, the Federal President of Swiss ConfederationUeli Maurer, suggested to the Federal Council that Klaus Schwab, who has lived in Switzerland for 60 years, be granted Swiss citizenship and a Swiss passport, based on the cantonal citizenship law. Although Schwab has Swiss parents, the President of the Swiss Confederation Simonetta Sommaruga rejected the application. The Federal Office of Justice from the department of Karin Keller-Sutter (FDP) ultimately rejected the granting of citizenship.[17]

Schwab as publisher of the World Economic Forum’s 2010 “Global Redesign” report postulates that a globalized world is best managed by a self-selected coalition of multinational corporations, governments (including through the UN system) and select civil society organizations (CSOs).[21] He argues that governments no longer are “the overwhelmingly dominant actors on the world stage” and that “the time has come for a new stakeholder paradigm of international governance”. The WEF’s vision includes a “public-private” UN, in which certain specialized agencies would operate under joint State and non-State governance systems.[22]

According to the Transnational Institute (TNI), the Forum is hence planning to replace a recognised democratic model with a model where a self-selected group of “stakeholders” make decisions on behalf of the people.[23] The think tank summarises that we are increasingly entering a world where gatherings such as Davos are “a silent global coup d’etat” to capture governance.[24]

Albert Bourla (Greek: Άλμπερτ Μπουρλά; born October 21, 1961) is a Greek-American veterinarian and the chairman and chief executive officer of Pfizer, an American pharmaceutical company. He joined the company in 1993 and has held several executive roles across Pfizer’s divisions. Prior to becoming chief executive officer, Bourla served as chief operating officer. Bourla was born and raised in Thessaloniki, Greece.[3] His parents, who were Sephardi Jews, were among the 2,000 of 50,000 Jews in Thessaloniki to survive the Holocaust; According to Bourla, his mother was allegedly minutes away from execution by firing squad when she was spared via a ransom paid to a Nazi Party official by her non-Jewish brother-in-law, while his father happened to be out of the Jewish ghetto when the residents were taken to the Auschwitz concentration camp and went into hiding, never to see his parents again.[4][5]

Angelo Oliviero Olivetti (21 June 1874 – 17 November 1931) was an Italian lawyer, journalist, and political activist. Olivetti was born in Ravenna, Italy. In 1892 while a student at the University of Bologna he joined the Italian Socialist Party. Following accusations of subversive activity, he fled to Switzerland in 1898. There he eventually met Benito Mussolini. Finding only limited support for his views within the socialist movement, in 1906 he began publishing Pagine Libre, a journal devoted to revolutionary syndicalism. He was expelled from Switzerland in 1912.

On 5 October 1914, Olivetti published the manifesto of the Fascio Rivoluzionario d’Azione Internazionalista. Mussolini shortly thereafter joined and assumed leadership of this fascio.

In March 1925, Olivetti was one of three Jewish speakers at the Congress of Fascist Culture.[1] He joined the faculty of the University of Perugia in 1931 as professor of political science, and died soon after in Spoleto, Italy.”

Revolutionary syndicalists like Olivetti sought to change society while preserving the nation. Mussolini combined this syndicalism with strains of nationalism into his fascism.[2]

Lazar Moiseyevich Kaganovich, also Kahanovich (22 November [O.S. 10 November] 1893 – 25 July 1991), was a Soviet politician and administrator, and one of the main associates of Joseph Stalin. He is known for helping Stalin come to power and for his harsh treatment and execution of those deemed threats to Stalin’s regime. Some suggest he was the man behind the mass democide of millions of Ukrainians and others who died of starvation from the engineered famine.

Born to Jewish parents in modern Ukraine, the son of Moisei Benovich Kaganovich and Genya Iosifovna Dubinskaya (1860-1933). Of 13 children in the family, 6 died. Besides Lazar there was his brothers Israel Kaganovich (1884–1973) (head of the Main Directorate for Cattle Harvesting of the Ministry of Dairy and Meat Industry of the USSR); Mikhail Kaganovich (1888–1941) (Head of the People’s Commissariat of the Aviation Industry of the USSR); Yuli Kaganovich (1892–1962)[3rd First Secretary of the Gorky Regional Committee of the CPSU]; Aron Moiseevich Kaganovich [?-1960s) and a sister Rachel Moiseevna Kaganovich (married name Latsman), lived with her husband in Chernobyl and died in 1926 [buried Kiev]. Kaganovich worked as a shoemaker and became a member of the Bolsheviks, joining the party around 1911. From shoemaker to literally a mass murderer; was it calculated or idiocy is the only question.

Are There Viable Solutions

How grand of them to give us back our right to use the herb cannabis, they usurped eighty years ago, on October 2, 1937, House Bill 6385: The Marihuana Tax Act. Yet a large group of politicians still voted against it. Only 5 Republicans voted for it and 6 Democrats voted against the bill to decriminalize a naturally occurring herb that people have utilized for thousands of years, coincidentally during a period when many Marxists were, just so happened to be, infiltrating our government. Sadly, some are saying, it is “unlikely” to pass the Senate.   

Think of our Constitution as our foundational rule of law, yet we have allowed it to be “unlawfully” abrogated to such a very high degree that many are making a strong case that we are no longer a lawfully constituted Republic. If true, is there a way to restore our society?

Are there viable solutions, has been the long-standing question and it appears playing in the arenas they control, the courts and legislatures, have been extremely futile. They surely are not going to ask somebody like me to be the Secretary of the Treasury, that’s reserved for the wealthy banking and investment interests. They obviously need the revenue or they wouldn’t be reinstating this right.

  1. Qualified Immunity is one of the major problems. Even when a government employee or official usurps somebody’s rights, they have commandeered the Courts and they most often eliminate any liability. Even Big Pharma is exempted from liability through the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program that has already paid out over $4.4 billion, so far, in claims. Most people don’t know about this, so they would not even know to make a claim.

The Constitution clearly states, that those that break their Oaths to support, protect and defend the Constitution, “shall Not Hold Office” and many in both major political Parties, more like gangs today, are complicit. Many people such as the group who voted against reinstating the above right, are actually complicit in destroying the very Constitution they have taken an oath to uphold. This is by definition an insurrection. When two or more people are involved in an insurrection, it is “treason”. We The People and our government have literally been overthrown from within, by the two most powerful political gangs and they are both highly violent and corrupt.

  1. The Constitution says they shall not hold office and,
  2. It says that any monetary claim to Congress to put down an insurrection, if successful, shall not be challenged.

So the provisions of restoring our constituted provisions are4 in the Constitution itself. We just need a large enough group to restore it.

In the below link, Andrew Colesanti, a founding member of the Counter-Insurgency Studies and Observation Group (COINSOG) makes the case that Biden and Harris by virtue of them campaigning to “legislatively” void the 2nd Amendment, for the right to bear arms, have thus broken their Oaths and thus should not have placed themselves on the ballot for the election. The Constitution gives us two lawful methods of amending the Constitution and both Biden and Harris have not advocated these methods and instead, have and are still attempted to unlawfully subvert the Constitution and its intent to protect the rights of the Citizens through unlawful legislative means. https://therightofchoice.wordpress.com/?p=158

Can you imagine a large group of COINSOG Citizens arresting Biden and Harris for insurrection and treason and putting them on trial? Right now, there are not enough members and obviously, security and privacy are of great importance to both the usurpers and we the people if we partake in such civil actions. Or we can maintain the status quo that appears to be taking us down a potentially violent path of incoherent civil unrest.

2. The Right of Choice; the website to the above link is about creating a substitute tax return that allows the individual taxpayers to choose which government programs they want or do not want to pay for with their taxes. With over 120 different taxes and regulatory fees, the government surely has plenty of discretionary money to pay for the less popular programs. If the IRS denies the use of the substitute returns, which is likely, the taxpayers, simply removes that section from their return and refiles it to meet their perceived income tax obligations. If they deny the substitute returns, this of course provides the Citizens a very interesting legal and constitutional challenge through the courts. The publicity alone would be worth the effort and a much easier sell to the average American to join in the movement. Seeing who pushes back and their arguments against such an initiative will surely be enlightening.   

Who Are Those Democrats?

By H. Skip Robinson, September 6, 2019

These are some of the largest contributors to the Democratic Party and the total amount they recently contributed.

Paloma Funds, Donald Sussman, CEO, $21,613,800. The is the founder and Chief Investment Officer of the Paloma Funds and the founder of New China Capital Management LLC. He is a member of the Board of Trustees of Carnegie Hall,[5] a member of the Board of Directors of ProPublica,[6] and an Honorary Trustee of the Ethical Culture Fieldston School.[7] His company Paloma Partners, was the largest contributor to the campaign of Hillary Clinton in 2016 .[8]  Sussman was born to a Jewish family[9] in June[10] 1946, the son of Beatrice (née Zimmerman) and William Sussman.[11] His father was a real estate developer.[11] They were the single largest individual contributors to the campaign of Hillary Clinton in 2016

Pritzker Group, Pritzker Family $16,626,207 The Pritzker family is an American family engaged in entrepreneurship and philanthropy, and one of the wealthiest families in the United States of America. Family members still largely own Hyatt, and owned the Marmon Group, a conglomerate of manufacturing and industrial service companies that has since been sold to Berkshire Hathaway.[1] Other holdings have included the Superior Bank of Chicago, which collapsed in 2001, the TransUnion credit bureauBraniff airlines, McCall’s magazine, and the Royal Caribbean cruise line. J. B. Pritzker (born 1965), founder of Pritzker Group Venture Capital (formerly New World Ventures), co-founder of Pritzker Group, Governor of Illinois (2019 – present) The Pritzker family is of Jewish descent[2] and based in ChicagoIllinois.[3] They were the second largest individual contributors to the campaign of Hillary Clinton in 2016

Renaissance Technologies, James Harris Simons Founder and Chairman $16,543,000. James Harris Simons was born on April 25, 1938[15][16] to an American Jewish family,[17] the only child of Marcia (née Kantor)[18] and Matthew Simons, and raised in Brookline, Massachusetts.[19] His father owned a shoe factory.[20] When James Simons was a teenager, he worked a job in the basement stockroom of a garden supply store. His inefficiency at the job resulted in his demotion as a floor sweeper.[21],  Renaissance was the 3rd largest individual contributor to the campaign of Hillary Clinton in 2016 .[8] 

Saban Capital Group, Haim Saban $12,283,411  is an American investment firm based in Los Angeles, California focused on media, entertainment, and communications investments. Formed in 2010 Saban Capital Group owns Saban Films,[1][2] part of Univision Communications,[3] and part of Celestial Tiger Entertainment.[4][5] He was a part owner of FOX Entertainments, is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and Israeli American Council. Saban Capital was the 4th largest individual contributor to the campaign of Hillary Clinton in 2016 .[8]

 

Newsweb Corporation. Fred Eychaner, (born c. 1945) is an American entrepreneur and philanthropist.[1][2] Eychaner is the Chairman of Newsweb Corporation.[3][4] He was included in Chicago magazine’s 2014 list of the 100 most powerful Chicagoans.[5] In 2005, the Chicago Tribune estimated his wealth at $500 million.[1] In 2015, he was inducted into the Chicago LGBT Hall of Fame.[6] Eychaner is a major donor to Democratic campaigns, gay rights advocacy groups, and arts organizations.[7] m Newweb was the 5th largest contributor to the campaign of Hillary Clinton in 2016 .[8]

 

Soros Fund Management George Soros $10,556,793  is a private American investment management firm. It is currently structured as a family office but formerly as a hedge fund. The firm was founded in 1969 by George Soros[1] and in 2010 was reported to be one of the most profitable firms in the hedge fund industry,[2] averaging a 20% annual rate of return over four decades.[3] They are headquartered at 250 West 55th Street in New York.[4] Soros was born in Budapest in the Kingdom of Hungary to a prosperous non-observant Jewish family, who, like many upper-middle class Hungarian Jews at the time, were uncomfortable with their roots. Soros has wryly described his home as a Jewish antisemitic home. The Soros Fund was the 6th largest contributor to the campaign of Hillary Clinton in 2016.

ASANA, Justin Rosenstein and Dustin Moskovitz formally a co-founder of Facebook. $6,005,556

Allegedly, Providence, Rhode Island runs an efficient government with Asana who provides workspace management software resources to public and private entities. Asana was the 6th largest individual contributor to the campaign of Hillary Clinton in 2016.

Slim Fast Foods, Daniel Abraham $6,005,400 born August 15, 1924, is an American businessman, investor, and philanthropist. He is the founder of Thompson Medical, whose main product is Slim-Fast, a diet program. He has endowed the S. Daniel Abraham Center for Middle East Peace and he supports Jewish causes in Florida and Israel. Slim fast foods was the 7th largest contributor to the campaign of Hillary Clinton in 2016. Abraham is a long-time donor to the Democratic Party and the Clinton Foundation. He gave $1.5 million to the party and ranked as the number one contributor of soft money to the national parties in 2000.[16] Abraham donated $3 million to Priorities USA Action, a super PAC which supported Hillary Clinton‘s 2016 presidential campaign.  

Lone Pine Capital. Steven Mandel $5,015,300 is an American-based hedge fund headquartered in Greenwich, Connecticut, established in 1997 by its president and portfolio manager, Stephen Mandel.[1] The firm has offices in London, New York City, and San Francisco.[1]

They were the 8th largest contributor to the campaign of Hillary Clinton in 2016.

Almost all the above information came from either Wikipedia or the company website.

Hillary Clinton’s Bundlers

The following info came from this website http://www.opensecrets.org/pres16/bundlers

Bundlers are people with friends in high places who, after bumping against personal contribution limits, turn to those friends, associates, and, well, anyone who’s willing to give, and deliver the checks to the candidate.

The Federal Election Commission requires disclosure only of those bundlers who are registered lobbyists. Beyond that, it’s up to the candidate. The Clinton campaign is releasing information about bundlers who raised over $100,000 (see list below); the campaign does not specify how much each of these individuals has raised beyond that. The Trump campaign has released no information about its bundlers whatsoever.

Together, 1,129 Extremely wealthy were directing at least $112,300,000 for Clinton’s election efforts — money that has gone into the coffers of her campaign as well as the Democratic National Committee.

Lawyers & Lobbyists, $21.9M, Unknown, $22.3M, Misc Business, $19M, Other, $17.2M, Defense, $100K, Labor, $100K, Transportation, $900K, Agribusiness, $1.2M, Construction, $1.4M, Energy & Natural Resources, $2M, Ideological/Single-Issue, $2.7M, Health, $5M, Communications/Electronics, $13.9M, Finance, Insurance & Real Estate, $31.5M, Top Economic Sectors of Clinton Bundlers, 2016

Top Industries of Clinton Bundlers

IndustryMin. Raised# of Bundlers
Lawyers/Law Firms$18,800,000188
Employer Listed/Category Unknown$17,400,000174
Securities & Investment$14,500,000145
Business Services$10,500,000105
Real Estate$10,200,000102

Clinton Bundlers

*The “Contributions” column indicates the total amount that the bundlers and their spouses have given to all federal candidates, parties and PACs in all election cycles since 1990.

NameCityStateEmployer*Contributions by bundler 1990-2016
Tom SteyerRedwood CityCAFahr LLC/Tom Steyer$143,044,701
Fred EychanerChicagoILNewsweb Corp$68,447,376
Donald SussmanRye BrookNYPaloma Partners$47,519,441
Marilyn SimonsNew YorkNYSimons Foundation$38,211,250
Haim & Cheryl SabanLos AngelesCASaban Capital Group$30,573,212
George SorosNew YorkNYSoros Fund Management$28,182,899
J.B. & M.K. PritzkerChicagoILPritzker Group$22,620,174
Dustin Moskovitz and Cari TunaSan FranciscoCAPhilanthropist$16,525,000
S. Daniel AbrahamWest Palm BeachFLSlim-Fast Foods$15,709,060
Bernard SchwartzNew YorkNYBLS Investments$15,152,913

 

Notice of Misprision of Treason

This is a copy of the certified letter that has been sent to President Donald Trump. The purpose as you will read, is to report to him as required under the Constitution, any and all known insurrections, treasons, and plots against the United States or “the Laws thereof”. According to the Constitution and the following United States Statute, it is a crime for any elected official to ignore the evidence and do nothing about it. This Group has been around for almost 30 years, and have witnessed and observed many examples of usurpations and criminal acts against the civilian population and laws of this country. We then officially, noticed via similar documentation as that below, numerous Presidents and other Public Officials of the crimes. It is now time for the Citizens to use the laws and Constitution to indict those involved. The question then becomes, how many are involved?

PART I—CRIMES

§2382. Misprision of treason

Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States and having knowledge of the commission of any treason against them, conceals and does not, as soon as may be, disclose and make known the same to the President or to some judge of the United States, or to the governor or to some judge or justice of a particular State, is guilty of misprision of treason and shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than seven years, or both. (June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 807Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(H), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

17 AUG 2020 – CERTIFIED U.S.P.S # 7017 0660 0000 6968 9470

To: Office of the President

Donald Trump, President of the United States

1600 Pennsylvania Avenue

Washington, D. C., 20500

Title 18 U.S.C. § 2382 Notice of Misprision of Treason

And

Qualified claim by COINSOG for appropriations under the rules of necessity and delegated authority of the 9th Amendment and Section 4 (insurrection clause) of the 14th Amendment to the Constitution for the United States of America to payments, bounties and pensions for services to put down rebellion and insurrection against the duly constituted Republic its Bill of Rights & Constitution.

Dear President Trump,

      Referenced law requires anyone owing allegiance to the United States and having knowledge of the commission of any treason or insurrections against the authority of the United States, or the laws thereof to make known the same to the President, some Judge of the United States, or to the Governor or Judges or Justices of a particular State. What I report to you is ongoing within the fifty States, the District of Columbia and the Commonwealths.       I must report to you, that most all Justices of the Supreme Court of the United States except for the Honorable Justice Thomas, most Federal, State, County and local Public Officials, Judges, Justices and their paramilitaries have used public appropriations, their public offices,  vacating their Oaths of Office intentionally in the process, to defy Federal and State laws with sufficient force and effect during times pertinent, so as to deny the power of the United States Constitution with their “Qualified Immunity” schemes. Thereby they, each of them, became insurgents against that Constitution as prescribed by Sections 3 (insurrection clause) and 4 (bounty clause) of the 14th Amendment using the definition of Federal case entitled, “In Re Charge to Grand Jury, N.D., Ill., 1894, 62 F. 828.”

     It has become abundantly clear that all Federal, State, County and local Courts in America are exacting their qualified immunity schemes to bolster a Police State apparatus whose mission is to pacify the American civilian population into submission of usurped powers thereby creating an arbitrary government. This is evidence, that these Courts no longer serve to benefit the civilian populations, instead victimizing them by the arrogant and unlawful violations of their natural civil and constitutional rights, thereby an insurrection has taken hold. Therefore, the best course of action is a counter insurgency under Section 4 (bounty clause) of the 14th Amendment directed at those cited in Section 3 (insurrection clause) of the 14th Amendment who have violated or vacated their Oaths of Office, thereby they shall not hold office.

       We the People have heard all the arguments in favor of qualified immunity, however not one argument negates the fact that it is insurrection, treason and conspiracy by Public Officials within the Judiciary that gave unchecked force to their paramilitaries in order to capriciously victimize the American civilian population. We all now witness the overwhelming call by segments of the civilian population and Public Officials to de-fund and even abolish police primarily because of the protections extended to them by the treasonous qualified immunity scheme. This matter Mr. President could be defused simply by the execution of an Presidential Executive Order abolishing qualified immunity, restructuring of police duties, and responsibilities and not as paramilitaries.

      Then there is the pressing question; “is America a duly constituted Republic or has it become a Police State Junta” with minimal protections of individual rights?  Not unlike those brutal Juntas that were trained at the Old School of the Americas, WHINSEC or of late American paramilitaries trained by the IDF in classic violent military pacification of civilian populations to force them into submission of usurpation’s, notwithstanding the Bill of Rights and Constitution.

     The arming of the current Police State Apparatus with military arms and implements of war became apparent with the enactment of the Gun Control ACT of May 1986 as the treasonous disarming of peaceful American civilians took hold as if it was a war upon their natural civil and constitutional rights. This has become the status quo, strengthened by the insurgent’s qualified immunity scheme.  Then there is the fact that nowhere within the text of the 2nd Amendment can one find the phrase “but in a manner to be prescribed by law” evidencing why the usurpers covet their treasonous blanket of qualified immunity.

     Coupled with qualified immunity “bound by an oath of office” as defined in the COINAGE ACT, a blanket bond scheme was developed, solely intended to pass the financial liability of bad actors in public office and their para-military enforces onto the taxpayers, thus unlawfully indemnifying themselves from personal liability.  There has been debate about whether or not any civilian uprising against the aforementioned treasonous insurgents cited within Section 3 (insurrection clause) of the 14th would be rebellion or insurrection against a duly constituted authority, in of itself? The best qualified answer we have found to this question is: EXCERPT’ reason for the militia; “to stand against any arbitrary government and its usurped powers as reiterated by Supreme Court Justice Story in Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States Vol. 3 at pp. 746-747 (1833). It is surely reasonable to conclude that in a nation with fundamental liberties, a direct remedy must be afforded those victimized, coerced and harassed by these insurgents and their para-military protectors. 

      Evidence of an insurrection is well documented, from within the various government bodies, using the qualified immunity scheme to deny the liberty and justice, intended by the Constitution and Bill of Rights. So now the question is, “has government at all levels become arbitrary?” The answer to this pressing question lies within but not limited to the following facts: two former Presidents were served with Notice of Misprision of Treason by members of COINSOG, as it relates to the courts they chose to aid and abet by their inactions. COINSOG members also brought forth cases citing insurrection, treason, and conspiracy into U.S. District Courts within several states of the union, again to no avail. Those states were New Mexico, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Missouri, Texas, South Dakota as well as the SCOTUS, even though early law required as mandatory “not discretionary” the SCOTUS review all cases citing insurrection. Then we have the fact “Congress knew or should have known of the unconstitutional qualified immunity schemes and the negative impact it would and has had on the civilian population, many of whom rot in jails who have and are denied their constitutional rights.  Not one meaningful or honest attempt from within has occurred to stop the ongoing insurrection and treason from within.  “Thereby it can be said an arbitrary government has indeed taken hold.”

      All of America who care to observe, as well as the members  of the Counter Insurgency Studies & Observation Group (COINSOG) have witnessed countless court cases brought forth by victims of the insurgent’s  unjust qualified immunity schemes to “try” to establish accountability for the ongoing usurpations of their natural civil and constitutional rights, only too further suffer from the “qualified immunity scheme used to deny, again and again any liability or accountability whatsoever and it still continues.”

     Even you Mr. President, I truly suspect, was unaware of those engaged in the insurrection and treason, as it relates to “RED FLAG LAWS”. The MO was seizing the guns first from honest and peaceable civilians and worry about the due process later. However, how are we the people to expect due process of law, while the blanket of treasonous qualified immunity is protected by our courts and instead, used by usurpers to trample upon the natural, civil and constitutional rights of the America population?

      I would be remis if I did not point out, there are other insurgents and their component forces at work 24-7, some of which are allegedly led by convicted Marxist terrorist, one of many terrorists pardoned by BILL CLINTON and ruthlessly targeting you Mr. President and the segment of America that supports you. The time has arrived to not only invoke Section 4 (bounty clause) of the 14th Amendment, to route out those insurgents who have disavowed their oaths of office, as cited in Section 3 (insurrection clause) of the 14th Amendment. To route out all insurgent component forces that threaten not only you Mr. President, but the election process, and the duly constituted Republic, its Bill of Rights, Constitution and those American’s who support you.

     In conclusion: Mr. President, common sense dictates, no one wants civil unrest, a civil war or perhaps a revolution. We must stop the usurpations exacted by embedded insurgents from within our own government and their component forces and the social unrest it is causing across the nation. If we do nothing” it will likely continue. The only logical and more peaceable path left to the American civilian population is to invoke Section 4 (bounty clause) of the 14th Amendment under the rules of necessity and delegated authority of the 9th Amendment. Thereby “COINSOG defined, as other armed forces of the United States of America”, reiterates its claim to payments, bounties, and pensions to put down the identified insurrection under Section 4 (bounty clause) of the 14th Amendment to the Constitution for the United States of America.

With respect,

ANDREW S. COLESANTI COINSOG DE OCCURRO TYRANNIS

CONTROLLED AND DIVIDED BY THE LIES OF THESE MEN

by H.SkipRobinson © 11/2019

There’s an old joke in politics, “how do you tell if a politician is lying? Their lips are moving. Sadly, the lies are often catastrophic for the majority and surely for the huge numbers of people affected by the social policies they put into place.

I am only going to go back, except for a couple of Presidents, for those in my life to show you how badly they lie and how badly they affect the majority.

Lyndon Baines Johnson; In 1964, two U.S. ships were “allegedly” attacked in Vietnam’s Gulf of Tonkin. President Lyndon B. Johnson got on the air that night to tell the American people about “the unprovoked attack and that he was orchestrating an aggressive response”. In reality, Johnson had already planned to attack North Vietnam. There was no unprovoked attack by the North Vietnamese. In 1965 he said, “For all I know, our Navy was shooting at whales out there”. The infamous Pentagon Paper leaked by Daniel Ellsberg to the Washington Post, New York Times and other periodicals, revealed that both the President and high-ranking Military Officials at the Pentagon lied to the American people to justify escalating the war in Vietnam. The government tried to unsuccessfully prosecute Ellsberg for treason and unsuccessfully sued the Post and Times. Johnson’s escalation of the Vietnam War causing the death of some 58,209 American men and 2,489 are missing. However, even some of my father’s fellow Navy pilots from the 1950s when he flew, men in the late 40’s, were shot down and died in the Vietnam War; escalated on a lie by Lyndon Baines Johnson.  

Richard Nixon; He was a lawyer who campaigned for the White House promising to end the Vietnam War. It later emerged, however, that he had secretly tried to sabotage peace talks in order to improve his electoral chances. “You don’t know how to lie. If you can’t lie, you’ll never go anywhere.” – President Richard Nixon, giving advice to a political associate. I think that sums up the character of Richard Nixon. The infamous Watergate scandal, which forced him to resign before he was impeached was just another part of his corrupt and deceptive nature. Of course, his Republican predecessor Gerald Ford pardoned him from any criminal prosecutions. The military-industrial complex has been one of the major contributors to the campaigns of Presidential front runners throughout our history which is perhaps much of the underlying problem. It is as much a conflict of interest as there can ever be with government contractors able to, directly and indirectly, contribute to both candidates and the two major parties through the RNC and DNC.             

Ronald Reagan; “I’m going to Cut the Federal Budget”. He, of course, signed bills that raised the Federal Budget almost every single year during his two, four-year terms in office. This was an important time in our economic history. We could have and should have cut the Federal budget as he promised to do during his campaign and why he won the election. This would have allowed us to balance the budget and not go any further into debt. We are now $23 Trillion in just Federally-issued Debt and over 10% of our $4.2 trillion annual Federal budget today is just interest payments of $479 billion on that debt. Of course, Modern Monetary Theorists, (MMTs) believe erroneously that continually borrowing and printing more debt-based fiat currency is sustainable despite the lack of “any” historically evidence. Not one country in world history has been able to survive such poor monetary and fiscal policies.    

In 1985, Iran offered to free the several hostages they’d taken in exchange for missiles. “We did not, I repeat, did not trade weapons or anything else [to Iran] for hostages, nor will we,” Ronald Reagan told the American people when suspicions started to rise. Though, a few months later, he admitted to doing just that: “A few months ago, I told the American people I did not trade arms for hostages. My heart and my best intentions still tell me that’s true, but the facts and evidence tell me it is not.”

It has always been the policy of the U.S. Government to “not” negotiate for the release of hostages which Jimmy Carter followed, very likely causing him the election against the self-admitted “liar” Ronald Reagan. 

William Jefferson Clinton; On Jan. 19, 1992 Bill Clinton said, “I want to make it very clear that this middle-class tax cut, in my view, is central to any attempt we’re going to make to have a short-term economic strategy.”

But on Jan. 14, 1993 at a press conference, Bill Clinton said, “From New Hampshire forward, for reasons that absolutely mystified me, the press thought the most important issue in the race was the middle-class tax cut. “I never did meet any voter who thought that.”

On Sept. 8,1992, Bill Clinton said, “The only people who will pay more income taxes are the wealthiest 2 percent, those living in households making over $200,000 a year.”

In response to a Bush-Quayle ad that people with incomes of as little as $36,000 would pay more taxes under the Clinton plan, Bill Clinton said on Oct. 1, 1992, “It’s a disgrace to the American people that the president (Bush) of the United States would make a claim that is so baseless, that is so without foundation, so shameless in its attempt to get votes under false pretenses.”

Yet the NY TIMES in the analysis of Clinton’s budget wrote, “There are tax increases for every family making more than $20,000 a year!”

“While Clinton continued to defend his middle-class tax cut publicly, he privately expressed the view to his advisers that it was intellectually dishonest.” (The Agenda, by Bob Woodward, p. 31)

In 1993, President Clinton ushered through Congress a large package of tax increases, which included the following:[2]

  • An increase in the individual income tax rate to 36 percent and a 10 percent surcharge for the highest earners, thereby effectively creating a top rate of 39.6 percent.
  • Repeal of the income cap on Medicare taxes. This provision made the 2.9 percent Medicare payroll tax apply to all wage income. Like the Social Security payroll tax base today, the Medicare tax base was capped at a certain level of wage income prior to 1993.
  • A 4.3 cent per gallon increase in transportation fuel taxes.
  • An increase in the taxable portion of Social Security benefits.
  • A permanent extension of the phase-out of personal exemptions and the phase-down of the deduction for itemized expenses.
  • Raising the corporate income tax rate to 35 percent.

As you can see these tax increases and phase-out and phase-down of allowable deductions did financially impact the middle-class wage earner, negatively. Clinton continued the tax on Social Security benefits to the elderly at a rate of 50%, which the Republican Ronald Reagan has first signed into law. The law is still in effect today negatively impacting middle and lower wage-earning seniors. I expect such actions from a Democrat but aren’t we told  Republicans like Reagan are fiscal conservatives. The idea of social security was to create a pension fund than they turn around an tax the benefits of the elderly 50% if you make more than a whopping $17,000 a year. It’s forcing especially the poorer seniors into poverty.        

“I did not have sexual relations with that woman.”The fact that it is against the law for members of Congress or the President to have sexual relations with interns should have provided him a little more impetuous for restraint. The fact that he then went on to say in defense of his actions, “having oral sex is not having sex.” just makes me think much less of Rhoads Scholars and attorneys. Getting caught with your pants down is one thing, lying and trying to weasel out of it is another.

The Whitewater scandal, or simply Whitewater, was a political controversy of the 1990s. It began with an investigation into the real estate investments of Bill and Hillary Clinton and their associates, Jim McDougal and Susan McDougal, in the Whitewater Development Corporation. This failed business venture was incorporated in 1979 with the purpose of developing vacation properties on land along the White River near Flippin, Arkansas.

A March 1992 New York Times article published during the 1992 U.S. presidential campaign reported that the Clintons, then governor and first lady of Arkansas, had invested and lost money in the Whitewater Development Corporation.[1] The article stimulated the interest of L. Jean Lewis, a Resolution Trust Corporation investigator who was looking into the failure of Madison Guaranty Savings and Loan, also owned by Jim and Susan McDougal.

Lewis looked for connections between the savings and loan company and the Clintons, and on September 2, 1992, she submitted a criminal referral to the FBI naming Bill and Hillary Clinton as witnesses in the Madison Guaranty case. Little Rock U.S. Attorney Charles A. Banks and the FBI determined that the referral lacked merit, but Lewis continued to pursue the case. From 1992 to 1994, Lewis issued several additional referrals against the Clintons and repeatedly called the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Little Rock and the Justice Department regarding the case.[2] Her referrals eventually became public knowledge, and she testified before the Senate Whitewater Committee in 1995.

David Hale, the source of criminal allegations against the Clintons, claimed in November 1993 that Bill Clinton had pressured him into providing an illegal $300,000 loan to Susan McDougal, the Clintons’ partner in the Whitewater land deal.[3] The allegations were regarded as questionable because Hale had not mentioned Clinton in reference to this loan during the original FBI investigation of Madison Guaranty in 1989; only after coming under indictment himself in 1993, did Hale make allegations against the Clintons.[4] A U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission investigation resulted in convictions against the McDougals for their role in the Whitewater project. Jim Guy Tucker, Bill Clinton’s successor as governor, was convicted of fraud and sentenced to four years of probation for his role in the matter.[5] Susan McDougal served 18 months in prison for contempt of court for refusing to answer questions relating to Whitewater.

Neither Bill Clinton nor Hillary Clinton was ever prosecuted after three separate inquiries found insufficient evidence linking them with the criminal conduct of others related to the land deal. The matter was handled by the Whitewater Independent CounselKenneth Starr. The last of these inquiries came from the final Independent Counsel, Robert Ray (who replaced Starr) in 2000.[6] Susan McDougal was granted a pardon by President Clinton.

On Jan. 19, 2001, the day before he left office, Clinton agreed to a five-year suspension of his Arkansas law license and his paying of a $25,000 fine to the Arkansas Bar Association. In exchange, Kenneth Starr’s successor, Robert Ray, agreed to close the Whitewater probe, ending the threat of criminal liability for Mr. Clinton after he left office.

Bill Clinton lied on such important matters, it needs probably another page. Here’s one in line with the Ronald Reagans of cutting the budget. President Clinton said on March 23, 1993, at a press conference: “My economic package will cut $500 billion from the deficit in five years.”

Bill Clinton has been praised as the only President since Eisenhour to have balanced the Federal budget. However, it was not his policies but the policies of the previous Congress that caused the budget to be balanced for just really one year. They had previously decided to close a large number of military bases around the Country and sell most of the land and assets causing the increased revenue in conjunction with his tax increases. We really needed to cut the budget, like Ronald Reagan had promised and failed to do. Clinton added $1.396 trillion, a 32% increase from the $4.4 trillion debt at the end of George H.W. Bush’s last budget, FY 1993.

This is the Debt added to the deficit during the Clinton years: FY 2001 – $133 billion, FY 2000 – $18 billion, FY 1999 – $130 billion, FY 1998 – $113 billion, FY 1997 – $188 billion, FY 1996 – $251 billion, FY 1995 – $281 billion, FY 1994 – $281 billion.

Understand that we can still add debt through government borrowing and run a surplus on the books as Clinton did. The closing and sale of the military bases was a part of the surplus.        

George Herbert Walker Bush (Father); “read my lips no new taxes”.  is a phrase spoken by the then-presidential candidate at the 1988 Republican National Convention as he accepted the nomination on August 18. Written by speechwriter Peggy Noonan, the line was the most prominent sound bite from the speech. The pledge not to tax the American people further had been a consistent part of Bush’s 1988 election platform, and its prominent inclusion in his speech cemented it in the public consciousness. The impact of the election promise was considerable, and many supporters of Bush believe it helped Bush win the 1988 presidential election.

The line later hurt Bush politically. Although he did oppose the creation of new taxes as president, the Democratic-controlled Congress proposed increases of existing taxes as a way to reduce the national budget deficit. Bush agreed to a compromise, which increased several existing taxes as part of a 1990 budget agreement. This is one of the easiest lies to coverup. Promise something you know is unlikely to be passed because the other Party has control of either the House, the Senate or both. This is classic campaign rhetoric 101.

In the 1992 presidential election campaignPat Buchanan repeatedly cited the pledge as an example of a broken promise in his unsuccessful challenge to Bush in the Republican primaries. In the general election, However Democratic nominee Bill Clinton, running as a moderate, also cited the quotation and questioned Bush’s trustworthiness. Bush lost his bid for re-election to Clinton, prompting many to suggest his failure to keep the pledge as a reason for his defeat.

George W. Bush (son); “We have discovered weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.” Of course, when the US Military invaded Iraq, they found nothing but some old saran and mustard gas which incidentally the U.S. has sold them years before. But we already knew that. Our own U.S. weapons inspectors had been in Iraq for years and had found nothing either. G.W. Bush and company thus relied on false intel provided by a known con man and foreign as a provocation to go to war with Iraq. Remember Lyndon Johnson.  

I’m only going to give you the lies of a couple of pre-WWII Presidents to show that this is nothing new. As Nixon alluded to, lying is a necessity in politics if you want to get elected.     

William McKinley; told another war-causing lie. He told Congress that Spain blew up the U.S.S. Maine in Cuba, which started the Spanish-American War of 1898. However, thanks to an investigation in 1976, it was discovered that Spain, in fact, did not blow up the U.S.S. Maine. A fire on the ship reached the boat’s ammunition stock and caused an explosion.

James K. Polk; was the 11th president of the United States, and he set his sights on expanding America’s territories. Specifically, he had his eye on California and New Mexico — Mexican territories at the time. When Mexico wouldn’t agree to sell him the territories, Polk sent troops “into Texas to cross the Nueces and guard the Rio Grande.” Mexico, of course, fired at the troops in response. Polk went to Congress and told them Mexico had “invaded our territory and shed the blood of our fellow-citizens on our own soil.” So began the Mexican-American War

Donald Trump; “I love Wikileaks” and “Don’t you love Wikileaks” were one of his favorite campaign slogans, every time to huge applause before being elected. A sealed indictment by the Trump Administration against Julian Assange was “accidentally” unsealed in another unrelated lawsuit. Since Assange, Edward Snowden and Bradley now Chelsea Manning’s incarcerations and/or necessity to seek political asylum in other countries, whistleblowing has come to a severe halt, unless protected by the RNC or DNC for political purposes.

Barrack Obama; partially won the Nobel Peace Prize for his participation in passing the Whistleblowers Protection Act, campaigned on open and transparent government and partially because he promised to stop the American participation in various wars around the world. Of course, he tried to prosecute more whistleblowers than any President in history. Now the Deep State, politicians and military-industrial complex can go about their corrupt work deceiving and ripping off the American people without fear of someone blowing the whistle on them. And of course, the wars still rage on, despite Trump also during his campaign, promising to bring the Troops home. Are you starting to notice a pattern?

As President Barack Obama entered office after campaigning on greater transparency, he promised, on his first day in the White House, to launch “a new era of open government.” Of course, his Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and most likely others, would begin to conducting government business on private email servers “to be more transparent”? 

As for Obama’s record, here’s what history will show: In his eight years in office, the Obama Justice Department spearheaded eight Espionage Act prosecutions, more than all US administrations combined. Journalists were also caught in the crosshairs: Investigators sought phone records for Associated Press journalists, threatened to jail an investigative reporter for The New York Times, and named a Fox News reporter a co-conspirator in a leak case. In Texas, a journalist investigating private defense contractors became the focus of federal prosecution and was initially charged for sharing a hyperlink containing hacked information that had already been made public.

Those Espionage Act cases included the trial of Chelsea Manning, who was held in solitary confinement for nearly one year prior to her military trial, prompting a condemnation from the UN special rapporteur on torture. “The absolute twisted passion with which the administration under Obama’s leadership has pursued whistleblowers is just appalling,” says Norman Solomon, executive director of the Institute for Public Accuracy and co-founder of RootsAction.org. “And as far as I can tell, the administration is unrepentant in that process. There’s just no other administration that comes close.”

Journalists’ concerns about their threatened rights became such a hot-button issue that Obama’s first US Attorney General Eric Holder had to publicly affirm that they would be spared from the confines of a metal cell under his watch. “As long as I’m attorney general, no reporter who is doing his job is going to go to jail,” Holder said.

The frequency of Espionage Act cases under Obama has earned him the reputation of waging a “war on whistleblowers.” New York Times reporter James Risen has called Obama “the greatest enemy to press freedom in a generation.” Damning words, indeed.

In 2015, the United States was about to drop out of the top 50 countries in the Reporter Without Borders’ annual press freedom index, sliding 29 spots since 2009 when Obama took office. In the international watchdog organization’s report, RWB cited the ongoing conflict with whistleblowers for the decline. The United States regained eight spots in 2016, but the home of the Bill of Rights finds itself in the same company as the nations, Burkina Faso and Botswana, and Slovenia—where, RWB notes, “anyone who feels offended or insulted by a newspaper article can demand the publication of a ‘correction’ in the same position in the newspaper.”

And last but not least, the Donald

Donald Trump; He has said so many lies, it’s really hard to know where to start. So, let’s start where Obama left off, with the prosecution of whistleblowers and one of Trump’s famous campaign slogans “I love Wikileaks” and “Don’t you just love Wikileaks” to huge ovations every time he said them. Wikileaks, of course, is headed by the now world-famous Julian Assange held captive, more like a hostage in the Ecuadorian Embassy in London before the U.S. made a deal with the newly elected President of Ecuador to kick Assange, out even those he was there under political asylum. This is where the deep state gets involved with the manipulation of other governments and their heads of state. We back monetarily using taxpayer dollars, those people who are willing to do what the deep state asks, completely outside the purview of the rule of law. Our Constitution does not authorize our government to interfere in the political affairs of other governments, yet this has been the status quo for decades and Trump has no intention of stopping it. It’s his Administration that had Assange arrested by the British and now in Prison. A U.S.  Arrest Warrant for Assange was accidentally unsealed in an unrelated court case, so Trump is following in Obama’s footsteps by continuing to suppress whistleblowers and the free press, whatever little there is out there, mostly alternative media sources with limited or no funding big business.

The New Your Times which is obviously a promoter of democratic socialism, did an interesting story on the Trumps lies so far. It’s obviously biased but some of it is sadly true. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/06/23/opinion/trumps-lies.html Here, however, is a sample of the authors at the New York Times lying. They wrote that Trump said “on “ JAN. 23 “Between 3 million and 5 million illegal votes caused me to lose the popular vote.” There are always illegal votes found but the New York Times wrote: (There’s no evidence of illegal voting.) However, I found another New York Times article that contradicts their own authors, on the Trump Lies Story. https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/jun/19/noncitizen-illegal-vote-number-higher-than-estimat/ This article said Trump Didn’t lie in this particular case.

So let’s see if we can find a lie in the above 1st New York Times hit piece because we know for sure we cannot trust this newspaper. One of the stories has to be false. FEB. 28 “We have begun to drain the swamp of government corruption by imposing a five-year ban on lobbying by executive branch officials.” The NYT is correct (They can’t lobby their former agency but can still become lobbyists.) Sadly, Trump has hired many people in his Cabinet that have been in the government bureaucracy for years. He is not draining the Swamp nor is his ban effective at stopping the individual from working with others to lobby their former agency, they just can’t do it directly themselves so it’s unenforceable. https://www.truthdig.com/articles/a-staggering-number-of-lobbyists-have-worked-in-the-trump-administration/  He is even hiring lobbyists himself.

With Justice for None; the four henchmen

@ H. Skip Robinson 04/01/2019

It is not hard to acknowledge that when Judges are chosen politically, the Judges will become as much a politician as those selecting them.  The confirmation hearings of Judges have become a political battle so adverse and contentious, that they are partially being fought through the legal system itself.

Of course, this is the worst thing that could ever occur in any society, but it has been the rule throughout human history. The Judges have always been a rubber stamp for the ruling class and the various factions want their candidate to be the one confirmed.  The should give you an indication of just how arbitrary judicial decisions have been and can be.  

“With Justice for None” is also the title of a book by the best-selling author and prominent defence Attorney Gerry Spence, now deceased, who wrote a highly critical review of our legal system.  

“A scathing indictment of how law is taught, practiced, and administered in this country . . . One of the best books ever written on the law.”—The Denver Post
 
“Renowned trial lawyer Gerry Spence takes an in-depth look at the American justice system and reveals a terrible truth: If you don’t have power or money, then you likely won’t receive justice either. The wealthy buy their way out of trouble, while the poor are punished. In an effort to combat this corruption, the author devises a number of reforms, tackling issues in every area of the system from law school to the courtroom.”

This is the truth about our legal system, and I have read and heard hundreds of stories over the years providing additional evidence. If you have the money to pay the extravagant prices the average Attorneys charges, and many of them are “poor to average” at best in their abilities to acquire justice, you will get better treatment that those that don’t have the money. Many of them are highly unscrupulous and will take your money and then do hardly anything to help you. And God forbid, having to use a Public Defender who is an indirect drain on the pension funds of the Judges and other government employees that work the justice system, I call Courthouse Vultures.   

IMHO, with the States and American BAR Associations, they have created a quasi power cartel full of individuals with highly questionable integrity. In 1820, Thomas Jefferson apparently agreed when he wrote; “The Judiciary of the United States is the subtle corps of sappers and miners constantly working underground to undermine the foundation of our confederated fabric.… the Federal Judiciary; an irresponsible body (for impeachment is scarcely a scarecrow) working like gravity by night and by day, gaining a little today and a little tomorrow and advance it’s noiseless step like a thief over the field of jurisdiction, until all shall be usurped from the States, and the government of all be consolidated into one…. when all government….in little as in great things, shall be drawn to Washington as the centre of all power, it will render powerless the checks provided of one government on another and will become as venal and oppressive as the government from which we separated.

Our Judiciary, has allowed, until just this week of 3/15/2019 the “extraordinary” excessive confiscation of money and property through unconstitutional Asset Forfeiture actions protected by the 8Th Amendment to be standard operations by local, state and Federal Law enforcement agencies. Finally, after decades perhaps even a century or so, of unlawful confiscations of property and money from the Citizens by government prosecutors and law enforcement, the Supreme Count finally has upheld and protected one of out constitutional rights, in a case Timbs v Indiana after the appellate determination by the Indiana Supreme Court, affirmed an action so unconscionable that it boggles the imagination.

We all know our political system is inherently flawed because of the effects of money on the system but unless you follow some of the lower and Supreme Court decisions carefully you are not necessarily cognizant of the Courts poor behavior.

I think they got Roe vs Wade right and many others but when it comes to the governments taxing and other confiscatory powers to fine, penalize and imprison, it is as if it is a profitable business to them.

I’ll give you one example. During the foreclosure epidemic, the South Florida Courts literally became a purely arbitrary system with a “rocket docket” mentality as it was being called by Attorneys, forgoing most of the rules of law and this was a determination from the top down, with the Senior Judges telling their subordinates to clear their docket, ruling against the homeowners almost 100% of the time. Come to find out the Judges have their own pension fund and they had invested in some of the mortgage loans sold be Wall Street and the banks.

Despite the various frauds initiated by the banks and mortgage lenders, homeowners lost their homes almost 100% of the time unless the banks made some sort of deal with the homeowners.  Here in So. Florida we still have huge numbers of foreclosures still on the dockets and it is often the banks themselves slowing the process. As a Realtor, I think they are trying to slowly bring these properties on the market so that the keep the inventories low and prices remain high but that’s another issue for another day. 

The rocket docket mentality still exists as far as the Judges siding with the banks, but the legal processes have normalized. If you think justice is being served, it is not. We even have found family members of the Judges being owners of banks or major shareholders. 

In the State of Florida, a jury trial is prohibited for foreclosure proceeding by Florida Statute allowing only the Judges to reside, called a Judicial Hearing over the determination of the cases. How can this even be constitutional? 

What is amazing is that Thomas Jefferson warned us about this so many years ago. He stated: “The opinion which gives to the Judges the right to decide what laws are Constitutional and what not, not only for themselves in their own sphere of action, but for the legislature and executive also in their spheres, would make the Judiciary a Despotic branch.  The new Constitution has secured these (individual rights) in the Executive and Legislative departments; but not in the Judiciary. It should have established trials by the people themselves, that is to say by jury.” Understand that he was writing about the jury being the final arbiter at the Appellate levels just as it is most often at the Circuit Court level. 

In one case We The People v. United States, 485 F.3D 140 (2007), one Judge made the initial decision in the lawsuit to deny the right to petition the government for redress of grievances under the 1st Amendment, a group of 62 questions relating to the Federal individual Income Tax, the U.S. Government would not answer.  A three Judge panel, including the now Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh upheld the usurpation and the SCOTUS refused to hear the case. https://openjurist.org/485/f3d/140/we-the-people-foundation-inc-v-united-states So, we had in this case, just “four” people determining if Citizens have the Right to petition the Government for Redress of Grievances under the 1st Amendment and expect honest answers to those questions.  Siding with Kavanaugh was Ruth Bader Ginsberg, Chief Justice and District of Columbia Circuit Court Justice, Judith W. Rogers. The initial Judge in the lawsuit at the DC Circuit was Judge Emmet G. Sullivan. I call them the four henchmen for usurping one of the most necessary rights of all. Our founding fathers petitioned King George as well and with the same results.

The proverbial question is why have a right to petition the government for redress of grievances, if the Government doesn’t have to honestly respond to questions pertaining especially to the tax laws of our nation? If they cannot answer such questions, how are they able to assess and enforce them?  

It was the single most influential action taken by those in the U.S. Government that made me come to the very sad but honest realization, as those from Princeton University and other academics have concluded. That we are an oligarchy and not a democratic republic any more, quashing the entire notion of any possibility of representative democracy under our current leadership and system. IMHO, it is the judiciary that provides the legal precedence that has slowly allowed the expanded size and scope of powers beyond the constitutional limitations set force in our rules of law.  There are legal and proper ways to amend our Constitution, yet the judiciary has ignored them on many occasions, legislating from the Bench as each political Party contends the other is doing. In all three of the above situations noted above, it was the Judiciary single handedly that was the final arbiter fostering the usurpation of rights protected by the Bill of Rights.           

Here are the 62 Questions posed in the formal petition for redress of grievances under the 1st Amendment presented to the IRS Department of the Treasury, The President of the United States and all 535 members of Congress. https://jurists4justice.com/essays/62-questions-the-irs-government-refuses-to-answer/

It simply comes down to just nine people determining the laws for a nation of 325 million people; two much power in the hands of too few individuals. With the negation of the right to petition for redress of grievances, they have now blocked all of the Citizens ability of any method(s) of direct oversight over those in judicial power, as Thomas Jefferson warned so very long ago.  You can vote your little hearts out and it will have little bearing, these justices are nominated and confirmed by the most politically powerful in our system.  The President and 100 Senators now decide our judicial fate.

Then we wonder why the Government has grown from having just one tax, a luxury import tax, to taxing everyone and everything we do with Gestapo like tactics, WWII Germany would be proud of. Total government spending at all levels is now at $7.4 trillion “annually” and we must borrow $1 trillion of that annually, now placing every household in debt to the turn of about $175,000.00 with a total of just the Federal Government debt now surpassing $22 trillion.

We are literally indebting the future generations beyond their potential of paying it back without debasing our currency even more.  Inflation has only been curbed by the poor economic conditions felt by everyone but the wealthy who appear to be oblivious to the effects placed on the middle to lower socio-economic spectrum.                                              

Lawlessness vs The Law

Larkin Rose explains, what some define as anarchy; without government, how it would work and why a civil society does not require a politically determined government.

Thinking that people will not defend themselves and their property, no matter what laws have been enacted, appears to escape those who claim governments police powers are a necessity in a civil society. The Police spend 98% of their time investigating criminal actions, not stopping them from occurring in the first place. Laws are simply typed words in books on shelves that honest people do not need and criminal ignore.

The Achilles Heel; the IRS Notice of Federal Tax Lien

My discoveries on this issue often plague me as I try to provide them to others, knowing that most will discount them as either “moot”, potentially dangerous to my liberty and somehow, but I don’t know why, theirs, or just a waste of time.

But when you discover a fraud or illegal activities being perpetrated by those in positions of power, is it not our duty to blow the proverbial whistle. To at least make others aware of the unlawful activities.

How about if the actions are so grandiose in their scope and effect, it would have profound implications for our society. How about if it affects our society to the tune of some $1.8 trillion annually. The middle class is being wiped out and we wonder why?

What I discovered can be presented as two separate but contiguous issues. 1. That the government will always refuse to answer two basic questions if you ask them. I’ve tried five different ways, including filing suit again the United States and submitting various  Freedom of Infomation Act requests to get them to answer these questions. The Federal Court even refused to force them to answer and the Supreme Court of the United States refused to hear the appeal, so this is no small matter. Of course, if they won’t answer these two basic questions, there is little chance of them telling you why and of course they never have.

Question 1. “What is the name of the Congressional Act that requires Citizens of the 50 States to pay a Federal Individual Income Tax on their labor when acting in their personal capacity as a private Citizen” and 2. “When was this Act passed into law?” These appear to be pretty straight-forward and critically important questions, right?

So this led me to my second discovery.  I kept asking myself, “why wouldn’t they answer these two important questions”. That prompted me to take a much closer look at all the documents I and others had received from the IRS over the years. Low and behold, not one single document I and others had received, had the Law I had been requesting on it. You thought the proverbial red flag right; actually, I was seeing a white flag in the hands of the IRS Commissioner and his agents but that’s more a fantasy than a reality for now.  It get’s even better. One of the last things I checked was the IRS Notice of Federal Tax Lien (NFTL) that are being filed at the county court levels and the underlying Federal Tax Liens, supporting the filing of the NFTL, as a notice to achieve priority.

Nope, the Law or Statute showing the Act was not on them either. Now here’s the kicker. The law or Statute it represents must be noted on them to be valid as enforceable liens. According to both Federal Statute and Treasury Regulations, the exact phrase for the statute that must be noted on the lien for it to be a valid lien is, “the tax liability giving rise to the lien.” Obviously, all Taxation, for it to be lawful, must be adopted via a government Statute that is lawfully enacted by our legislative bodies, either local, State or at the Federal level. In other words, a government agency just can’t create a tax and be able to enforce it, without it first being properly promulgated through the legislative process and enactment.

So where’s the Legislative Act? Beats me and the Government won’t provide it. FYI: There were well over 2,000 people who participated in the lawsuit.

So, I simply placed some of the Liens I had researched in my book and then just cut and pasted the various elements noted on the liens. So it was pretty easy to provide the evidence for my contention. I take you through it step by step showing each element and the actual text I cut and pasted so you can read and understand it for yourself. I wanted a sophomore in high school to be able to understand it and I think I reached my goal.

Do you want to stop the constant wars and corruption permeating our society or not? In 1950 the entire Federal annual Budget was only $314 billion, surely they can do it now without the Federal Individual Income Tax because they’re still collecting through a plethora of other taxes and regulatory fees, over $1.2 trillion annually. The governments going to bitch and moan, but the waste, earmarks, and pork, if cut, would easily handle most of the cost reduction. That’s what the swamp really is. It’s not necessarily people although there is surely a lot of deadwood and redundancy that could be cut.